All Blood Sugar Levels Aren’t Equal, Study Shows
I thought this article was too good not to quote almost in it’s entirity .. but I didn’t. Please read the whole thing if you have a family history of diabetes, are considered over weight, or have had some high fasting blood sugar levels your doctor was concerned about.
Normal Blood Sugar May Belie Diabetes Risk
Category : Diabetes | Tags :WebMD Medical News
Wednesday, October 05, 2005Oct. 5, 2005 – When it comes to predicting type 2 diabetes risk, not all normal fasting blood sugar levels are equal, new research shows.
Fasting blood sugar levels that are currently considered in the normal range may actually be predictive of diabetes in otherwise healthy men. Higher yet normal-range blood sugar levels may predict diabetes risk, along with body weight, family history of the disease, or blood fat levels, according to the study published in the Oct. 6 issue of The New England Journal of Medicine.
The findings make it clear that what is normal for one person may not be normal for another when it comes to blood sugar testing, researcher Amir Tirosh, MD, of Israel’s Sheba Medical Center, tells WebMD.
“Independently, this test doesn’t tell the whole story,” he says. “The thinking has been that there is a single cutoff point for what is normal, but this doesn’t seem to be the case. It depends on the individual.”
Soldiers Followed
Fasting blood sugar testing is widely used to diagnose type 2 diabetes and identify people at high risk for developing the disease. The test measures the amount of sugar in the blood, called glucose, after an overnight fast.
A blood sugar level of up to 100 mg/dL is considered normal, while people with levels between 100 and 125 mg/dL are considered to have impaired fasting glucose or prediabetes. Diabetes is typically diagnosed when the fasting blood glucose levels rise to 126 mg/dL or higher.
In the newly reported study, healthy, nondiabetic male Israeli soldiers were followed for 12 years. Blood samples were analyzed for fasting blood glucose levels. During that time, 208 of the approximately 13,000 men with initially normal blood sugar levels developed type 2 diabetes.
Despite normal blood sugar levels, those who were obese, had a family history of diabetes, and had high levels of blood fats (triglycerides) were nine times as likely as men with none of these risk factors to develop diabetes.
The researchers also show that men with the highest normal-range blood sugar, even levels of 90 mg/dL, had a higher risk.
![[del.icio.us]](http://joscafe.com/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/delicious.png)
![[Digg]](http://joscafe.com/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/digg.png)
![[Facebook]](http://joscafe.com/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/facebook.png)
![[Google]](http://joscafe.com/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/google.png)
![[LinkedIn]](http://joscafe.com/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/linkedin.png)
![[MySpace]](http://joscafe.com/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/myspace.png)
![[StumbleUpon]](http://joscafe.com/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/stumbleupon.png)
![[Twitter]](http://joscafe.com/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/twitter.png)
![[Yahoo!]](http://joscafe.com/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/yahoo.png)
![[Email]](http://joscafe.com/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/email.png)




1Fitch
wrote on 12 October 2005 at 1:18
Hi, off topic here. I noticed that on your blogroll you indicate who’s local, and Alabamian. Dr. Phat Tony’s should be indicated as Huntsville, AL. I don’t know if that’s the local area or not, but I do know it’s Alabama. I just wanted to let you know, and thanks for stopping by Radioactive Liberty. On topic, I’m not smart enough to understand the information being imparted here.
2Jo
wrote on 12 October 2005 at 6:07
Thank you for stopping by. Actually, the local part of the blog roll is for people in my immediate area. Sin City, Basil and redneckin actually live in the immediate area where I live. We probably drive by each other on a daily basis and don’t even know it!
As for the topic part — I’m a diabetic and I think it’s so important for everyone to get tested, and then this article comes along and says that normal readings may be all that normal! That’s why it’s imporant, I think, that everyone get tested during their yearly physicals and every time they go to the doctor.